Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on December 15, 2004
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/ari016
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/2/482    most recent
ari016v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C.
Right arrow Articles by Braithwaite, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C.
Right arrow Articles by Braithwaite, V. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology © International Society for Behavioral Ecology; all rights reserved.
Received May 12, 2004
Revised November 1, 2004
Accepted November 8, 2004

Article

Effects of predation pressure on the cognitive ability of the poeciliid Brachyraphis episcopi

Culum Brown 1* and Victoria A. Braithwaite 1

1 Institute of Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Culum Brown, E-mail: culum.brown{at}ed.ac.uk


  Abstract

Variable levels of predation pressure are known to have significant impacts on the evolutionary ecology of different populations and can affect life-history traits, behavior, and morphology. To date, no studies have directly investigated the impact of predation pressure on cognitive ability. Here we use a system of replicate rivers, each with sites of high- and low-predation pressure, to investigate how this ecological variable affects learning ability in a tropical poeciliid, Brachyraphis episcopi. We used a spatial task to assess the cognitive ability of eight populations from four independent streams (four high- and four low-predation populations). The fish were required to locate a foraging patch in one of four compartments by utilizing spatial cues. Fish from areas of low-predation pressure had shorter foraging latencies, entered fewer compartments before discovering the reward patch and navigated more actively within the maze, than fish from high-predation sites. The difference in performance is discussed with reference to forage patch predictability, inter- and intraspecific foraging competition, geographic variation in predation pressure, boldness-shyness traits, and brain lateralization.

Keywords: Brachyraphis episcopi; cognition; evolution; poeciliids; predators; prey.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.